Subscribe: by email or Podcast
Enter your Email to Track Changes in OSINFO


Powered by FeedBlitz
View Paulo Felix's profile on LinkedIn Follow osint on Twitter online ping broadband test
SEARCH SITE
NEWS & ARCHIVE

Widget_logo

World Newspapers Frontpages

Login

osinfoseal2.gif

Tuesday
Jan242012

Japan's strategic outlook

Image: Josh Liba / flickr

19 December 2011Japan will remain an introverted strategic player during the next decade, and for Australia, the challenge is how to partner with that inward-looking Japan.

Japan has endured a difficult couple of decades, but probably confronts another. With its economy stalled, its political system still evolving towards a genuine multiparty system, and its population ageing and shrinking, it confronts a daunting array of domestic challenges.  The great East Asian earthquake of March has only added to its problems. The after-effects will be felt for years, not least in the continuing nuclear problems at Fukushima. Those challenges mean Japan will probably remain an introverted strategic player during the next decade or so.  Arguments made by a range of commentators about five years ago, that Japan had entered a critical ‘turning point’ in its strategic policy, now seem less compelling.

For Australia, the challenge is how to partner with that inward-looking Japan over the next ten-to-fifteen years. The pace of change in Asian strategic settings is such that much may change during that period. And there aren’t many Japan-sized players in the regional system, so we have to work to ensure that the one we already have remains committed to shared objectives to the greatest extent possible. We need to ‘work with’ Japan, perhaps bringing more ourselves to the relationship to offset Japan’s period of hesitancy.  But we might also need a ‘work around’ strategy—accepting that we need to do more with others to compensate for Japan’s strategic hesitancy. Australia wants an Asia with a range of engaged great powers—and Japan is an important part of that future Asia.’

Dr Rod Lyon, Director of ASPI’s Strategy and International Program, is the author of this report.

Image: Josh Liba / flickr

Monday
Jan232012

Islam in Denmark The Challenge of Diversity


Add to Cart
 
 
 
History Europe / General
 
Description
Author(s)
TOC
Reviews
Tuesday
Jan172012

Objective Force Warrior: Another Look

Tuesday
Jan172012

The Muslim Brotherhood's Radical Plan for Egypt

Tuesday
Jan172012

Assessing Freedom of Movement for Counterinsurgency Campaigns

Cover: Assessing Freedom of Movement for Counterinsurgency Campaigns

Freedom of movement (FoM) is the actual or perceived degree to which individuals or groups can move from place to place within a given environment or into and out of that environment. FoM is clearly an important consideration in the development of counterinsurgency tactics, operations, and strategies, but it is addressed infrequently and inconsistently in the doctrine and literature on counterinsurgency. A consistent, comprehensive definition of FoM must take into account the range of complexities and challenges posed by the operating environment, as well as the practical reality that FoM means something different to different groups. Focusing specifically on Afghanistan, this examination considers actual and perceived FoM for civilians, coalition and Afghan security forces, government officials, nongovernmental organizations, and insurgents and profiles the factors that influence these groups and affect data reporting in potentially misleading ways. It also serves as a guide for a bottom-up approach to developing sustainable FoM assessment processes that consider the range of variables that can enable and inhibit actual freedom to move and that can affect the subsequent analysis of FoM data. A historical and global review of a sample of the FoM assessment literature and interviews with assessment experts also clarify best practices and gaps in knowledge and capability that assessment staffs could address.

Monday
Jan162012

Peru and the Search for Gateways Into the EU (Viewpoints, No. 83)  

Monday
Jan162012

The Coming Resolution of the European Crisis

Monday
Jan162012

The Impact of Corruption on Investment

Monday
Jan162012

The Possibility of a Crisis in North Korea in 2012

 
 
Cho Han Bum
 
2012-01-11 / 7 p.
 
 
 
co12-03(E).pdf [다운:17]
 
 
  contents   index  
The major commonality between the collapse of socialism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe and the recent Jasmine Revolution is that almost no one predicted either event. The communist bloc possessed a formidable research force and had performed many long-term studies, but these all tended to cling to the belief that socialist systems would remain unchanged and thus failed to anticipate the collapse that began in the late 1980s...

 

Monday
Jan162012

Living with North Korea without Kim Jong Il: A South Korean Perspective


 
 
Kim Tae Woo
 
2012-01-11 / 14 p.
 
 
 
co12-02(E)-1.pdf [다운:10]
 
 
  contents   index  
It seems that Kim Jong Il, the man who held supreme power in North Korea for 37 years, was after all just a human being with a biologically limited life span. He died of a myocardial infarction brought on by overwork on December 17th, 2011, as announced by the North Korean government some 2 days later. The regime quickly proclaimed the dawn of the “Kim Jong Eun era” and moved to formalize and legitimize the new leadership in the wake of Kim Jong Il’s death. The new North Korean leadership headed by Kim Jong Eun has been steadily working to fill the power vacuum, proceeding smoothly through Kim Jong Il’s funeral on December 28th and the memorial service on the 29th, and naming Kim Jong Eun supreme commander on the 31st...